J.K. Rowling Faces Backlash After Saying ‘There Are No Trans Kids’

J.K. Rowling is going through backlash for her controversial views on transgender points, together with current claims that “there are not any trans youngsters.”

As a consequence of her remarks, the writer has discovered herself on the heart of one other social media storm months after being slammed for her remarks about boxer Imane Khelife.

Regardless of J.Ok. Rowling’s remarks, HBO has defended her position within the upcoming “Harry Potter” collection, stating that her inventive enter is invaluable.

Rowling has confronted backlash in recent times for her outspoken views on gender and ladies’s rights, and now the “Harry Potter” writer has as soon as once more sparked controversy together with her current remarks, asserting that “there are not any trans youngsters” and dismissing the concept people may be born within the flawed physique.

In a submit on X, Rowling responded to a critic accusing her of “hateful deal with trans youngsters,” writing: “There are not any trans youngsters. No youngster is ‘born within the flawed physique.'”

She doubled down: “There are solely adults such as you, ready to sacrifice the well being of minors to bolster your perception in an ideology that can find yourself wreaking extra hurt than lobotomies and false reminiscence syndrome mixed.”

Rowling’s assertion triggered a wave of reactions from throughout X (previously Twitter).

Supporters thanked the writer for defending what they noticed because the well-being of youngsters, with one consumer writing: “‘Thanks for being a robust voice in defending kids.”

One other commented, “Thanks for utilizing your voice and recognition to deliver mild to fact and rescue kids from life-altering errors.”

Nevertheless, not everybody agreed with Rowling’s assertion, as a number of on the social media platform criticized her stance.

One critic sarcastically questioned her authority on the topic, commenting, “You are additionally a medical skilled. Did not know that. This factor that everybody well-known for something feels the urge to behave as an skilled of one thing else… makes me loopy!”

One other individual famous: “Did not notice my companion does not exist! i suppose she by no means was a trans child like, significantly. What do you say to the many individuals who transitioned youthful and reside joyful lives now ?”

Yet another individual stated, “I recall listening to Margaret Thatcher say this very factor again within the late 80s about gays and lesbians. What a approach to make use of your voice and platform. Have you ever ever thought-about really caring about girls? You’ve got aligned your self with a few of the worst misogynists as a substitute. Unconscionable”

Earlier this 12 months, Rowling shared that former colleagues who had distanced themselves from her in public resulting from her views on transgender points privately reached out to “verify they have been nonetheless buddies.”

The writer has been vocal about her opposition to phrases like “individuals who menstruate,” describing such phrases and phrases as “cis” as rooted in ideology.

Regardless of her controversial stance, Rowling had earlier maintained that she helps the transgender neighborhood. In accordance with the Each day Mail, In June 2020, she revealed that she “cherished trans individuals” however famous that “erasing the idea of intercourse removes the flexibility of many to meaningfully focus on their lives.”

Nevertheless, ever since, Rowling has solely turn into increasingly more vital of Trans individuals and gender-affirming surgical procedures.

In August this 12 months, she sparked fury on-line after commenting on Algerian boxer Imane Khelife, who participated within the girls’s 66 kg (welterweight) boxing occasion on the 2024 Olympics and gained the gold medal.

Rowling caught flack after calling the boxer, who had been beforehand disqualified from one other competitors for not assembly gender eligibility guidelines, a “male who is aware of he is protected by a misogynist sporting institution.”

Khelife has since filed a lawsuit with French authorities, wherein she named Rowling and Elon Musk for his or her alleged “acts of aggravated cyber harassment.”

Final month, HBO stood by Rowling after she confronted intense criticism over her views on transgender points.

The community obtained many complaints about Rowling’s position as govt producer of the upcoming “Harry Potter” TV collection.

In a press release to Selection, the community responded: “We’re proud to as soon as once more inform the story of ‘Harry Potter’ – the heartwarming books that talk to the facility of friendship, resolve and acceptance. JK Rowling has a proper to precise her private views. We’ll stay targeted on the event of the brand new collection, which can solely profit from her involvement.”

Regardless of HBO’s protection, the venture has drawn combined reactions. Some followers criticized the difference as “pointless,” whereas others threatened to boycott the collection over Rowling’s controversial remarks.

In an interview with Newsweek, Evan Nierman, CEO of PR agency Crimson Banyan, mentioned the worth of Warner Bros. Discovery, the dad or mum firm of HBO, supporting Rowling.

He famous, “By publicly supporting J.Ok. Rowling, Warner Bros. is investing in a colossally inventive and profitable writer, versus taking a public stance on the controversial transgender subject.”

In the meantime, cultural analyst and author Areej Shaikh recommended that whereas Warner Bros. Discovery’s (WBD) assist of Rowling could replicate a shift in how corporations strategy cancel tradition, it does not signify a victory for Rowling within the broader cultural debate.

“This determination signifies a change towards extra publicly endorsing contentious personalities when their inventive affect is valued, but it surely doesn’t essentially imply Rowling has ‘gained’ the cultural warfare,” she stated.

Shaikh additionally famous that the studio “appears to be placing the ‘Harry Potter’ franchise’s cultural and monetary historical past forward of the divisive controversy” plaguing Rowling.

“This technique implies that as a substitute of adopting clear-cut positions, companies could now be navigating cancel tradition with a better emphasis on placing a stability between public opinion and inventive contribution,” the analyst concluded.