Generally often called The Man with No Title, Clint Eastwood can be the Director Who Received’t Sluggish Down, even into his 90s. His profession is fascinating, and plainly extends past simply directing, after all. He rose to prominence again within the late Nineteen Fifties, due to the TV present Rawhide, after which turned a movie star by the point the Nineteen Sixties got here round. Certainly, that decade noticed the discharge of what’s most likely the very best movie he starred in with out directing: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
Beginning within the early Nineteen Seventies, Clint Eastwood additionally started directing, typically starring within the motion pictures he directed whereas additionally showing in motion pictures he didn’t direct (like Escape from Alcatraz and Within the Line of Hearth). To give attention to his directorial credit, although, what stands out to start with is how constantly Eastwood’s labored as a director. Between 1971 and 2024, he made 40 characteristic movies, which might be staggering if he simply centered on directing… however as talked about earlier than, he’s additionally acted a complete bunch throughout this time, too. Whereas not each movie of his is a masterpiece, he’s actually been behind some nice ones, and surprisingly few complete duds, too. What follows is a rating of each movie Eastwood has directed, beginning with the not-so-great and ending with some real classics.
‘The 15:17 to Paris’ (2018)
Starring: Ray Corasani, Spencer Stone, Anthony Sadler
There was an try at one thing daring with The 15:17 to Paris, however the execution let it down. It dramatized a real-life story about three American males who thwarted a terrorist assault on board a prepare whereas vacationing in Europe. The boldness got here from the truth that it received the three precise males to basically play themselves, recreating the central occasion whereas additionally performing out moments from their lives main as much as it.
It is a noble thought, however the three leads don’t seem significantly comfy – and even pure – taking part in themselves. You may respect what they did, but it surely’s tougher to be wowed by their performances right here, as harsh as that is perhaps to say. Elsewhere, The 15:17 to Paris is kind of sloppily put collectively from a writing and modifying perspective, and what ought to’ve been a stirring thriller instead becomes a very clunky melodrama.
- Runtime
-
94 minutes
- Essential Style
-
Biography
- Writers
-
Dorothy Blyskal
, Anthony Sadler
, Alek Skarlatos
, Spencer Stone
, Jeffrey E. Stern
‘The Rookie’ (1990)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Charlie Sheen, Raúl Juliá
As will turn out to be clear in a bit, Clint Eastwood had a pretty good decade in the 1990s, all issues thought-about, particularly as a result of it noticed him discover appreciable awards success (wins for Finest Image and Finest Director the identical yr). However issues didn’t kick off amazingly effectively on this decade, seeing as 1990 noticed the discharge of The Rookie, a film that feels as if it was directed by one.
It’d sound attractive on paper, as a result of the thought of a cop film starring Eastwood and Charlie Sheen is, in idea, probably too bizarre to be boring, however no… The Rookie is boring. It feels a lot longer than the 2 hours it runs for, and seeing flat motion sequences and continuous scenes of Sheen and Eastwood clashing actually will get previous surprisingly quick.
‘Firefox’ (1982)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Freddie Jones, David Huffman
Describing Firefox will make it sound extra fascinating than it’s, maybe much more so than was the case with The Rookie. This can be a Chilly Battle film that flirts with the sci-fi style whereas (purportedly) being an motion/thriller movie, following Eastwood’s character, a talented pilot, going to the USSR to steal a top-secret jet fighter that the Soviets are growing.
You’ve received paranoia, a transparent goal, and Eastwood doing his typical stoic factor… it ought to all make for a enjoyable film, however outdoors a number of transient moments of life right here and there, Firefox is a somewhat plodding flick to truly watch. There’s a standard sentiment that mediocre motion pictures needs to be remade greater than already good motion pictures, and that could possibly be stated about Firefox, maybe, if the Chilly Battle was nonetheless going. It’s sadly relegated to being a relic of its time, and a reasonably underwhelming/disappointing one at that.
‘Hereafter’ (2010)
Starring: Matt Damon, Cécile de France, Bryce Dallas Howard
Firefox was uncommon for being an (virtually) science fiction film directed by Eastwood, whose movies are usually grounded extra in actuality, and Hereafter is equally novel for being kind of a fantasy movie; emphasis, perhaps, on “sort of.” It’s principally a drama, and it additionally performs out like a catastrophe film, particularly in its first act, thanks to at least one somewhat spectacular sequence early on that depicts the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami.
The movie follows a girl who miraculously survives stated occasion, and the best way she’s probably mysteriously linked to 2 different individuals who have some sort of hyperlink to the afterlife. There are large concepts which are prodded at in Hereafter, but it surely by no means dives as deep into things like it may or ought to. It comes near being transferring at instances, but it surely’s the sort of movie that simply doesn’t stick the touchdown, and it finally turns into regrettably tedious to observe, at a sure level.
‘J. Edgar’ (2011)
Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Naomi Watts, Armie Hammer
J. Edgar feels a little bit torn between being one thing subversive and surprising, and one thing a little bit more by-the-numbers, as far as biopics go. Unsurprisingly, the central determine right here is J. Edgar Hoover, and the movie does what it could possibly to seize a large chunk of his life, with Leonardo DiCaprio taking part in Hoover over quite a few many years, full with some fairly unconvincing old-age make-up.
It’s a film that’s at its most fascinating when exploring sexual repression, provided that’s the sort of stunning a part of what in any other case looks like a typical biopic a couple of noteworthy American particular person from the twentieth century. The participating/putting stuff will get a little bit misplaced within the total movie, although, which may typically be overwrought and a bit uninteresting. There are each issues to admire and dislike in J. Edgar, in starkly equal measure, actually.
‘Blood Work’ (2002)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Jeff Daniels, Anjelica Huston
Not fairly a legendary thriller by any means, however a kind of competent one, Blood Work comprises one among Eastwood’s remaining lead performances; certainly, he solely had outstanding roles in 5 motion pictures since 2002. He’s been extra centered on directing as he’s gotten older, it appears, and that’s resulted in some nice motion pictures. Not Blood Work, although. Probably not. This one’s simply okay.
It’s anticipated stuff so far as cop motion pictures go, with Eastwood taking part in an FBI profiler who comes out of retirement to work on a case that includes monitoring down a serial killer. It’s not very profitable as a thriller film, however supplies some enjoyable bursts of motion right here and there, and seeing an older Eastwood be gruff and sarcastic is all the time, on the very least, a little bit bit entertaining.
‘The Gauntlet’ (1977)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Sondra Locke, Pat Hingle
Lengthy stretches of The Gauntlet are sadly a bit uninteresting, however the film comes alive at sure factors no less than, primarily when it focuses on delivering action. It’s received the form of easy premise that matches effectively with that style, being a couple of cop who’s tasked with escorting a high-profile witness out of Las Vegas, contending with the assorted individuals who need her useless.
It’s one among a number of motion pictures Eastwood starred in with Sondra Locke, however not one of many pair’s higher ones. The Gauntlet does admittedly keep away from overstaying its welcome an excessive amount of, clocking in, mercifully, at below two hours, and it’s typically put collectively in a reliable sufficient manner. Issues drag at sure factors, although, and the general movie can really feel surprisingly lifeless at instances, even with the excessive stakes that appear inherent to its central story.
‘Bronco Billy’ (1980)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Sondra Locke, Geoffrey Lewis
It’d sound like sacrilege, however Eastwood’s work as a director was much more inconsistent in the 1970s and 1980s than it was within the Nineteen Nineties and 2000s, the latter twenty years being when the filmmaker was typically at his greatest. Hell, you could possibly even argue that the 2010s noticed the discharge of typically higher Eastwood movies in comparison with his first twenty years spent behind the digital camera. That sense of Eastwood bettering his craft may be appreciated if you happen to’re prepared to do a deep dive into his filmography.
However you’ll come throughout movies like Bronco Billy, which simply don’t actually stand out or excel. To Bronco Billy and the credit score of comparable movies, although, no less than they don’t stand out in unhealthy methods, both. That is only a very commonplace and maybe overly loose-feeling romantic dramedy with a little bit of a contemporary Western vibe. It comes after which it goes, all in just below two hours, and that’s that.
‘Heartbreak Ridge’ (1986)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Marsha Mason, Everett McGill
Clint Eastwood has directed a handful of great war movies in his time, although Heartbreak Ridge is not fairly one among them. It’s tonally odd, to not point out a bit plodding, like many different less-than-great or typically mediocre Eastwood-directed flicks. The main focus right here is extra on coaching than fight, which is not the drawback; in any case, think about how fascinating one thing like Full Metallic Jacket is whereas exploring that space of army life.
The issue is greater than Heartbreak Ridge is not massively participating on an emotional entrance, nor significantly insightful in what it has to say about warfare. One may reward it for being impartial or seeming well-balanced, positive, however there’s nonetheless the issue of it not being fully participating. That may sound overly detrimental for a movie that’s nonetheless admittedly competent, however Heartbreak Ridge simply falls a bit brief, and it’s sort of a disappointment, somewhat than a real hidden gem inside Eastwood’s sizable filmography.
‘The Eiger Sanction’ (1975)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, George Kennedy, Vonetta McGee
As soon as once more, the phrase “competence” rears its not fairly ugly head. Its underwhelming head? Disappointing head? That got here out improper. Um, yeah, The Eiger Sanction is form of competent for an action/adventure movie. Nothing extra, nothing much less. The story is about an murderer out for revenge, and there’s additionally a variety of snow, which means it’s one among Eastwood’s chilliest motion pictures.
Nothing extra of any actual be aware may be stated right here. The Eiger Sanction exists. Eastwood broods, comes out of retirement, and will get snarled in some pretty ho-hum motion set items. It is perhaps simpler to suggest if it was a little bit extra brisk, however the movie feels regrettably flabby due to its runtime, which exceeds two hours. Massive Eastwood followers would possibly discover some pleasurable components right here, however in any other case, it’s exhausting to get too smitten by this one.
‘Honkytonk Man’ (1982)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Kyle Eastwood, John McIntire
There are followers of Honkytonk Man, and a few would possibly think about it one among Clint Eastwood’s extra private and underrated motion pictures, in order that needs to be acknowledged. It’s almost a musical, too, being centered on a younger boy and his uncle as they journey round throughout the Nice Melancholy, the latter being a musician who’s struggling greater than ever as a result of a nationwide lack of cash.
Clint Eastwood stars alongside his son right here, Kyle Eastwood, and Honkytonk Man can be one among a number of movies directed by the previous that showcases his ardour for music. It’s a very languidly-paced movie, and that lack of tightness could make it drag at instances, but it surely captures the period during which it’s set pretty effectively, and one will get the sense Eastwood actually wasn’t on autopilot right here. It simply would’ve been nice if the eagerness right here was a little bit extra infectious.
‘Absolute Energy’ (1997)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Gene Hackman, Ed Harris
It’s straightforward to combine up Absolute Power with varied different motion/crime/drama motion pictures from the Nineteen Nineties, which was a decade when folks appeared prepared to call such movies as generically as doable. Or, perhaps the star energy was what counted right here, over any sort of catchy title, as a result of there are some large names in Absolute Power, including Gene Hackman, Ed Harris, Laura Linney, and Judy Davis (alongside Eastwood himself, after all).
The plot right here is a couple of thief witnessing a homicide that includes the President of america, after which happening the run after being within the improper place on the improper time places his life in peril. It’s a paranoia-heavy movie that needs to be a bit extra gripping than it’s, but it surely’s nonetheless stable and solely a little bit disappointing. With appropriately tempered expectations (exhausting to do when that forged is so good, admittedly), it’s a reasonably respectable watch.
‘Sully’ (2016)
Starring: Tom Hanks, Aaron Eckhart, Laura Linney
To not be blended up with a certain Robert Zemeckis movie in regards to the aftermath of a dangerous airplane maneuver that saved lives, Sully is differentiated from that one (Flight) as a result of it’s straight primarily based on a real story. It stars Tom Hanks as a pilot who landed a malfunctioning airplane on the Hudson River, which ended up saving the lives of the 150+ folks on board.
Sully sort of peaks with the inciting incident, and the majority of the film (you realize, the aftermath) fails to be fairly as dramatically fascinating. Nevertheless it does reach a retelling of a nonetheless pretty latest precise occasion, all of the whereas being solidly acted and assembled from a filmmaking perspective. Insert joke about Eastwood being on autopilot right here (however autopilot Eastwood, it must be stated, can nonetheless crank out a good movie).
‘The Mule’ (2018)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Bradley Cooper, Laurence Fishburne
There’s extra simplicity to be discovered within the very easy The Mule, which is, as of writing, the penultimate Clint Eastwood movie he each starred in and directed. It’s a film that sees him going back to the ever-familiar crime genre, with the story right here specializing in an aged man who, as a result of determined monetary stress, finally ends up turning into a drug courier.
Owing to Eastwood’s age, and the age of his character, The Mule is, by design, hardly an exciting sort of crime movie, but it surely’s an empathetic and typically emotionally profitable one. It depicts a sort of hardship confronted by those that are growing older in a blunt and usually trustworthy manner, and in its lighter moments, The Mule can be surprisingly life-affirming and even a little bit humorous.
‘Changeling’ (2008)
Starring: Angelina Jolie, John Malkovich, Jeffrey Donovan
Changeling is a reasonably grueling watch; if not Eastwood’s absolute bleakest, then it might be a contender. The premise right here includes a girl’s little one going lacking for a number of months, after which additional issues ensuing when she’s “reconnected” with him, however is firmly of the assumption that the child is – to paraphrase the King of Pop – not her son.
It’s one other one among these Eastwood-directed movies that’s fairly good, albeit not precisely nice. Angelina Jolie is superb right here within the lead function no less than, and there are different stable performances to be discovered right here (Clint Eastwood motion pictures that aren’t The 15:17 to Paris may be relied on to typically comprise good performing). You won’t be wowed total, then, by Changeling, but it surely’s nonetheless fairly satisfying as a drama with a period setting.
‘True Crime’ (1999)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Isaiah Washington, LisaGay Hamilton
Sorry, however Blood Work, Absolute Energy, and True Crime do sort of blur collectively, so forgive any commentary for the final of these sounding a contact acquainted. These three Eastwood motion pictures all have crime/drama/thriller components, got here out across the similar time, and share an analogous really feel… to not point out the truth that all are, sadly, a little bit sluggish from a pacing perspective.
Fortunately, the acting here’s dependably good, and True Crime has one thing of a pulse at instances due to a narrative a couple of journalist who believes a person on Loss of life Row is definitely harmless. It may’ve benefited from being a little bit extra breathless and/or thrilling, however True Crime – as soon as extra – will get the job finished. And, to its credit score, it’s maybe a contact extra compelling than both Blood Work or Absolute Energy.
‘Jersey Boys’ (2014)
Starring: John Lloyd Younger, Vincent Piazza, Michael Lomenda
Clint Eastwood’s ardour for music emerges as soon as extra in Jersey Boys, which is sort of the closest he’s come to directing a Martin Scorsese crime movie. You may even argue that Scorsese would’ve finished this materials a little bit higher (there’s profanity, some mob components, a story spanning years, voiceover, and Joe Pesci… not as an actor, however as a personality!), however there’s nonetheless one thing enjoyable about seeing Eastwood deal with it.
Jersey Boys is usually about Frankie Valli and the forming of the 4 Seasons, exploring the ups and downs that got here with forming the group and touching upon how they had been considerably linked to the mob. It’s an uneven movie for positive, and never all the time an enthralling one, but it surely comes alive at sure factors and finally ends up being a stable – and typically distinctive – tackle the music biopic style.
‘House Cowboys’ (2000)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Tommy Lee Jones, Donald Sutherland
It doesn’t matter if the title sounds silly and the film itself is perhaps flawed; one doesn’t merely flip down a film that stars Clint Eastwood, Donald Sutherland, and Tommy Lee Jones, amongst others. There are many cool previous folks in right here being cool previous dudes, and that makes House Cowboys a quintessential “dad movie,” for many who are both older males or just have that dad way of thinking.
And, positive, dad motion pictures don’t all the time get important acclaim or really feel significantly intelligent, however typically, their blunt appeal is simply what the physician ordered. House Cowboys follows a bunch of previous guys happening a typically entertaining journey into area, reliving their youths whereas engaged in a somewhat high-stakes mission. It’s sort of a hangout film, it’s sort of dumb, but it surely’s additionally form of exhausting to withstand, and would possibly effectively qualify as underrated, all issues thought-about.
‘Sudden Influence’ (1983)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Sondra Locke, Pat Hingle
It’s hopefully not controversial to say that the Dirty Harry collection commenced with what was simply its greatest movie, and ultimately ended with its worst (the fifth). Close to to the top (however not a nadir) was Sudden Influence, the fourth featuring Harry Callahan, and the one Soiled Harry film to be directed by Clint Eastwood himself. Curiously, every of the 5 motion pictures had a distinct director, too.
Anyway, with Sudden Influence, the narrative includes Callahan having to take care of a feminine vigilante who’s out getting very justifiable, and violent, revenge on quite a few horrible folks. There are questions raised by the movie surrounding what she does versus what Callahan does, and although it’s by no means as in-depth as could be ultimate, Sudden Influence is admirable for giving viewers one thing to chew on no less than, alongside being one other pretty entertaining Soiled Harry sequel, on extra of a intestine/fundamental stage.
‘Invictus’ (2009)
Starring: Morgan Freeman, Matt Damon, Tony Kgoroge
A historic movie that doesn’t happen all that way back within the total scheme of issues, whereas additionally functioning as something of a sports movie, Invictus is about rugby getting used as a solution to try to carry folks collectively in South Africa proper after the apartheid period. It’s precisely what you’d count on it to be, however there’s nothing too improper with that when beats are sufficiently hit and acceptable feelings are mined.
Like too many Clint Eastwood movies to say, Invictus is a little bit longer than it must be, however there’s extra right here that works than doesn’t work. It’s additionally higher than the opposite Eastwood-directed film starring Matt Damon (Hereafter), but it surely’s inferior to the opposite movies Eastwood directed Morgan Freeman in (extra on these Finest Image winners in a bit).
‘Cry Macho’ (2021)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Eduardo Minett, Natalia Traven
This placement would possibly elevate some eyebrows, however these sentimental about Clint Eastwood and his legacy will doubtless discover elements of Cry Macho to be genuinely transferring (whereas different elements are, positive, a bit clunky). That is, as of 2025, the ultimate film Eastwood has starred in, and can most likely be his final, given the person’s now in his mid-90s and Cry Macho feels so successfully like a swansong, too.
It’s one of many actor/director’s lesser Westerns, positive, but it surely virtually shouldn’t be in comparison with them. It’s a gentler, slower, and – appropriately – older-feeling Western than anything Eastwood’s made inside the style, however it appears like a becoming cinematic equal of a victory lap for somebody whose profession took off due to the Western style; as talked about earlier than, on each the TV display within the late Nineteen Fifties and throughout the Nineteen Sixties on the large display.
‘Flags of Our Fathers’ (2006)
Starring: Ryan Phillippe, Jesse Bradford, Adam Seaside
The lesser part of a war duology, although nonetheless fairly good in its personal proper, Flags of Our Fathers is partly in regards to the Battle of Iwo Jima, seen from the U.S. perspective, and partly about its aftermath. On each fronts, there’s a specific give attention to a famed {photograph} displaying six males elevating an American flag on Mt. Suribachi, uncovering the reality behind it and the way these captured within the picture handled life after the battle was over.
Successfully anti-war in its strategy to one among many battles fought throughout World Battle II, Flags of Our Fathers is somber, gritty, and typically fairly transferring. It was launched the same year as Eastwood’s superior companion film in regards to the Battle of Iwo Jima (to be elaborated on a little bit down the road), however each halves of this total story – effectively, two halves of the identical story, arguably – are nonetheless price experiencing.
‘Midnight within the Backyard of Good and Evil’ (1997)
Starring: John Cusack, Kevin Spacey, Jude Legislation
With a fairly long title and a comparatively lengthy runtime of 155 minutes, Midnight within the Backyard of Good and Evil feels wider in scope than many different Clint Eastwood motion pictures coping with crime and justice. Eastwood’s returned to exploring such themes repeatedly, doing so in ways in which had been inferior to this movie, however on the similar time, Midnight within the Backyard of Good and Evil is exceeded in high quality by varied different thematically comparable Eastwood motion pictures.
Nonetheless, there’s a certain eeriness to this one that’s simpler to admire, with its plot regarding a reporter trying right into a high-stakes homicide trial that includes one very rich particular person. Midnight within the Backyard of Good and Evil doesn’t should be greater than 2.5 hours lengthy, however most of it’s fairly good, and it finally ends up feeling as if it’s one among Eastwood’s extra underappreciated efforts total, even with a number of flaws holding it again from true greatness.
‘Play Misty for Me’ (1971)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Jessica Walter, Donna Mills
It’s comprehensible why Jessica Walter is best known for Arrested Development, however so far as movie performances go, Play Misty for Me might be her most well-known/memorable. Basically, she performs an obsessive fan of a disc jockey (performed by Eastwood), with the movie being a slow-burn thriller about her obsession rising more and more harmful and, ultimately, violent.
Play Misty for Me can be noteworthy for being the first feature film Clint Eastwood directed, and got here out the identical yr he starred within the first Soiled Harry movie. So it’s a little bit overshadowed by that one, but it surely works as a reasonably good – and unabashedly direct – thriller, and it’s of undeniably sturdy high quality for a directorial debut. Following this one, Eastwood did certainly transfer on to each greener and, uh, browner(?) pastures.
‘Excessive Plains Drifter’ (1973)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Verna Bloom, Marianna Hill
Funnily sufficient, right here’s Clint Eastwood’s second characteristic movie as director, Excessive Plains Drifter, which was a minor improvement upon his debut, Play Misty for Me. As a movie, it’s sort of a giant deal, as a result of after starring in a fair few iconic Westerns, Eastwood tried his hand for the primary time at directing one right here, and he did a removed from unhealthy job.
Additionally starring within the movie, Excessive Plains Drifter sees Eastwood as a gunfighter who stumbles right into a city, proves his alarming talent with a gun, after which will get employed by the townspeople there to kill a number of extra males. It’s a gradual and atmospheric Western that will get fairly darkish and unsettling at instances in a manner that feels novel, mitigating the truth that the pacing does make it really feel a little bit uneventful at instances, no less than on a story entrance. However for evoking the distinctive temper it does, this one’s price looking for out.
‘Richard Jewell’ (2019)
Starring: Paul Walter Hauser, Jon Hamm, Kathy Bates
The 2010s wasn’t as fruitful a decade because the 2000s had been, concerning Clint Eastwood and the movies he directed, however Richard Jewell did sneak into the previous decade, and worked as a more than solid drama impressed by actual occasions. That places it according to Sully, having one other story about somebody’s act of heroism resulting in intense scrutiny, but it surely handles such a premise – and the related themes – in a extra compelling trend.
It is competently written and edited, although finally elevated by its performances, with Paul Walter Hauser (within the titular function) and Kathy Bates being particularly nice. It’s one other Eastwood movie that sort of begins, performs out, after which ends the best way you’d count on it to, however hey, it’s environment friendly, well-acted, and covers an fascinating real-life story, so that every one makes Richard Jewell really feel like greater than sufficient.
‘Hen’ (1988)
Starring: Forest Whitaker, Diane Venora, Michael Zelniker
Okay, that is the final time a Clint Eastwood film can be described as too lengthy, however it’s the largest factor that holds Hen again from being a top-tier work by the director. It’s an interesting biopic about Charlie ‘Hen’ Parker that sprawls out throughout 161 minutes, in a manner that some would possibly discover uninteresting, whereas others would possibly see it because the cinematic equal of improvising in a fittingly jazzy manner.
It wanders round and rambles, however that could possibly be a part of the purpose; it feels intentional, so viewing it that manner makes the size arguably a little bit extra comprehensible. And Hen is putting as a portrait of a skilled and iconic – yet also troubled – artist, with its strategy, model, and size working to set it other than most different music-focused biopics on the market.
‘Breezy’ (1973)
Starring: William Holden, Kay Lenz, Roger C. Carmel
Launched the identical yr as Excessive Plains Drifter, Breezy is well probably the most ignored Clint Eastwood movies, and one among his most distinctive. It’s a fairly straightforward romantic drama, and although not the one movie of the director’s that could possibly be described as such, it’s nonetheless not the sort of film Eastwood’s sometimes related to, as both an actor or director.
With Breezy, it was the primary film he directed that he didn’t additionally star in (although he has an uncredited cameo, Alfred Hitchcock-style). As an alternative, William Holden and Kay Lenz star on this, taking part in two very completely different folks – of very completely different ages, too – who kind a wierd sort of connection after crossing paths by likelihood. That age hole is certainly what Breezy explores, and it does so tastefully for one thing of its age, however it will be comprehensible if some modern-day viewers turned on the film due to the premise flat-out.
‘Juror #2’ (2024)
Starring: Nicholas Hoult, Toni Collette, Chris Messina
Name it recency bias if you need, however Juror #2 is genuinely a very good courtroom drama that was remarkably launched the yr Clint Eastwood turned 94, and even when the movie hadn’t been good, that achievement in itself would nonetheless be spectacular. If it’s to be his directorial swansong, then it actually wouldn’t be a horrible one to exit on, as a result of Juror #2 is a really Eastwood-esque exploration of justice and morality.
Juror #2 issues a person who’s sitting on the jury for a homicide trial, and finds himself torn between saving himself and doing what he’s imagined to when he realizes he could have inadvertently performed a job within the crime itself. It’s a well-paced and admirably lean film, filled with sturdy performances and, although not flashy, it’s straightforward to observe and surprisingly entertaining.
‘The Bridges of Madison County’ (1995)
Starring: Meryl Streep, Clint Eastwood, Annie Corley
Alongside Breezy, The Bridges of Madison County is one other uncommon romantic drama directed by Clint Eastwood, although he stars on this one, in contrast to that different 1973 movie. However then once more, the very best efficiency on this one’s ultimately given by Meryl Streep, taking part in a housewife who strikes up a short however passionate romance with Eastwood’s character, a photographer.
There’s a sure disappointment that hangs over a lot of The Bridges of Madison County, by design, making it bittersweet; not fully missing in sentimentality or tenderness, in different phrases. It’s a movie that seeks to seize how love may be tumultuous and outlined by heavy ups and downs, even when it’s between two individuals who met when they were (more than) almost young. It’s mature, affected person, and profitable in displaying a distinct facet to Eastwood as a director.
‘American Sniper’ (2014)
Starring: Bradley Cooper, Sienna Miller, Kyle Gallner
One of the best Clint Eastwood movie made since 2010 is American Sniper, which serves as each an fascinating warfare film and an undoubtedly strong biopic. It’s about U.S. Navy SEAL Chris Kyle, taking one thing of a Flags of Our Fathers-like strategy by exploring scenes of fight alongside the expertise of returning residence after combating and struggling to readjust to civilian life.
It was additionally a bit divisive, no less than amongst some circles, however American Sniper does really feel prefer it’s making an attempt to make you consider whether or not warfare and the notion of heroism can exist facet by facet. Some would possibly really feel it celebrates what it shouldn’t, some would possibly really feel it’s appropriately important or no less than impartial, whereas some would possibly really feel it celebrates one thing it ought to. American Sniper doesn’t actually decide, but it surely does ask questions. Few folks really feel impartial about it, and that’s spectacular for a movie directed by somebody who, throughout manufacturing, was effectively into their 80s.
‘White Hunter, Black Coronary heart’ (1990)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Jeff Fahey, Charlotte Cornwell
Is White Hunter, Black Coronary heart the most underrated Clint Eastwood movie? Perhaps! It’s the type that you just’re unlikely to actually study until you do a deep dive into his filmography, or attempt to watch every thing he starred in and/or directed. It’s a genuinely fascinating and unfairly ignored movie, following an American director who splits his time in Africa between filming and looking, more and more pursuing the latter over the previous, inflicting inevitable drama.
Eastwood provides an extremely dedicated efficiency right here as a really flawed man, and directs your entire movie with an analogous quantity of talent. White Hunter, Black Coronary heart has frequently fascinating insights into violence, creativity, and obsession, taking a easy premise and doing advanced issues with it thematically. It additionally makes nice use of its setting, being amongst Eastwood’s best-looking motion pictures within the course of.
‘Pale Rider’ (1985)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Michael Moriarty, Carrie Snodgress
Certain, the premise of Pale Rider is much like Excessive Plains Drifter, however the strategy and total really feel differ, making each Clint Eastwood Westerns inevitably price looking for out. Eastwood’s a mysterious stranger as soon as once more (shock, horror) who’s gruff and expert with a gun, and finds himself employed by some determined townspeople to guard them towards the aggressive forces of a close-by mining firm.
He is not quite the Man with No Name here, however Eastwood does play a person who says he’s a preacher, and he’s solely credited as “Preacher,” so maybe you possibly can hyperlink Pale Rider thematically to these older Sergio Leone Westerns starring Eastwood. It’s a visually putting watch and one other worthy exploration of acquainted themes, characters, and iconography. Eastwood simply does this sort of Western so effectively that it’s sort of exhausting to withstand, even with the sense of déjà vu.
‘A Excellent World’ (1993)
Starring: Kevin Costner, Clint Eastwood, Laura Dern
A Perfect World is not an ideal film, but it surely’s additionally not far off. It got here out one yr on from Clint Eastwood’s first (of two) Finest Image wins, and whereas not fairly hitting the identical highs, proved to be removed from a disappointing follow-up. It takes a wierd premise and makes it work shockingly effectively, following the odd friendship that kinds between a convict on the run and a younger boy he sort of kidnaps.
There would’ve been some ways for A Excellent World to go improper, but it surely typically sidesteps such potential points and emerges as a extremely sturdy crime-flavored highway film. Eastwood’s good in a supporting function, and Kevin Costner turns in one of his very best performances within the lead function right here, because the oddly likable escaped prisoner. It’s a little bit underrated, maybe, and a variety of good.
‘The Outlaw Josey Wales’ (1976)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Chief Dan George, Sondra Locke
If it weren’t for one different film launched in 1992, The Outlaw Josey Wales would finally stand as the very best Western Clint Eastwood ever directed. It’s nonetheless most likely his most shocking and confronting, exploring violence in a manner that felt unflinching, even again within the somewhat uncompromising decade for filmmaking that was the Nineteen Seventies.
It’s unsurprisingly a film that sheds gentle on the outlaw side of life, back in the Old West, however does so in a manner that makes its titular character (performed by Eastwood) an antihero; somebody initially hellbent on revenge, however then has a better objective thrust upon him. There’s an power and anger felt in The Outlaw Josey Wales that ensures it nonetheless packs a punch, and a powerful argument to be made that it was the primary actually nice movie Eastwood directed.
‘Gran Torino’ (2008)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Christopher Carley, Bee Vang
As earlier movies have doubtless proven by now, Clint Eastwood is not against having his movies get a little bit sentimental, although it’d effectively be Gran Torino that’s his biggest tearjerker… in a good way, it needs to be harassed. That is one among 4 nice motion pictures Eastwood directed between 2003 and 2008, all being accountable for the 2000s standing because the director’s single greatest decade (and, once more, all these had been made whereas Eastwood was in his 70s).
Of those 4 motion pictures, Gran Torino has the most important half for Eastwood to play in entrance of the digital camera, portraying a Korean Battle veteran who learns to beat prejudice and finally finds redemption for the issues he believed and did up to now. There’s little or no about Gran Torino that’s delicate, when it involves exploring issues like racism and generational gaps, but it surely will get away with it as a result of it’s an intensely honest film. It’s blunt, and typically messy, but it surely means effectively, and proves supremely stirring when it must be.
‘Mystic River’ (2003)
Starring: Sean Penn, Tim Robbins, Kevin Bacon
Gran Torino was bittersweet, in some ways, however Mystic River was principally simply bitter, standing as a truly harrowing crime/drama film about grief and the lingering penalties it could possibly have at its most intense. Three males are all impacted in several methods when one among them suffers an unthinkably terrible tragedy, resulting in the unraveling of sure – and frequently distressing – truths.
That’s all to say that Mystic River is just not a enjoyable or entertaining film within the conventional sense, but it surely’s extraordinarily engrossing, even if you happen to would possibly discover that one watch is sufficient (it’s a tricky one to try to revisit, as soon as you realize what’s coming). It’s a film that digs deep and hits exhausting, showcasing Eastwood at his greatest as a director whereas additionally having some nice performing, with Sean Penn and Tim Robbins, specifically, each handing over career-best performances.
‘Million Greenback Child’ (2004)
Starring: Hilary Swank, Clint Eastwood, Morgan Freeman
The darkness retains coming and it don’t cease coming, as a result of one yr after Mystic River, Clint Eastwood directed one other devastating film: Million Dollar Baby. This appears like a deconstruction of a typical sports activities film; the type that’s not afraid to say: “You may want one thing actually badly, however that doesn’t, by any means, make sure you’ll get what you are after.”
That’s life, however that’s not often what sports activities motion pictures go for, so which means Million Dollar Baby really stings. It’s exceptional, although; once more, not a enjoyable film, however one which’s engrossing for almost each minute of its runtime. It understandably turned the second film directed by Eastwood to win Finest Image, and he provides an important efficiency right here, too, as do Hilary Swank and Morgan Freeman.
‘Letters from Iwo Jima’ (2006)
Starring: Ken Watanabe, Kazunari Ninomiya, Tsuyoshi Ihara
The second a part of a duology, with the primary half being the aforementioned Flags of Our Fathers, Letters from Iwo Jima is the even stronger half. It’s an unbelievably highly effective anti-war movie, exploring the Battle of Iwo Jima as soon as extra, however this time centering on the Japanese perspective. Hopelessness and loss of life dangle heavy all through. Sympathetic and really human characters are launched, fleshed out, after which killed with out warning. On it goes. It by no means stops being upsetting.
It really works to make Flags of Our Fathers hit tougher, too, when one assesses the entire image and sees what a horrible battle this was for all concerned. However when judged individually, Letters from Iwo Jima is the one which hits tougher. It’s an extremely delicate film, hitting all of the emotional notes it must with out counting on melodrama or pressured sentimentalism. It’s nonetheless too early to say for positive, however many years from now, it might well emerge as Eastwood’s most timeless film; the one that might effectively endure the longest.
‘Unforgiven’ (1992)
Starring: Clint Eastwood, Gene Hackman, Morgan Freeman
But for nearly as good as these 2000s releases are, Clint Eastwood’s single biggest achievement as a director was a film he made a little bit earlier: Unforgiven. Effectively, “earlier” comparatively talking. Unforgiven remains to be a movie that feels late-era, within the sense that it appears like an older, wiser, extra mature, and extra brutally trustworthy Western than something Eastwood had been concerned with earlier than. Legacy and the previous are explored, each narratively and thematically.
In entrance of the digital camera, it’s probably Gene Hackman who shines the brightest, however Eastwood’s efficiency right here may debatably be his biggest, Morgan Freeman is unbelievable, and Richard Harris – although not within the film a lot – does quickly steal the film. Behind the digital camera, Clint Eastwood’s by no means finished higher work, although. Unforgiven is tense, thrilling, emotional, stunning, tragic, uncompromising, and startlingly entertaining/approachable. It simply does every thing proper, by no means actually hitting a false be aware. On high of being the best-directed Clint Eastwood film, Unforgiven can be simply flat-out one of many biggest Westerns ever made, too. Some Finest Image wins are divisive, however this one was greater than well-deserved.