Sean “Diddy” Combs‘ legal professionals filed a brand new doc on Tuesday asking the choose to dismiss the third cost that the U.S. lawyer’s workplace introduced on him.
Diddy is being charged with intercourse trafficking, racketeering, and transportation to have interaction in prostitution. Nevertheless, the embattled rapper argues that the feds are pursuing their third depend towards him with a “racist” regulation as a result of he is a profitable black man.
Sean “Diddy” Combs’ lawyer has maintained his innocence on all counts amid the elevated variety of sexual assault lawsuits he is been embroiled in since his September arrest.
Article continues beneath commercial
Diddy Believes Feds Are Attempting To Use ‘Racist’ Regulation To Nail Him
The rapper has come out swinging towards federal authorities, accusing them of trying to take him down utilizing an outdated and “racist” regulation.
In response to TMZ, Diddy’s attorneys had been in court docket on Tuesday, the place they filed paperwork looking for to dismiss depend 3 of his costs, which accuses him of “transportation to have interaction in prostitution,” often known as the Mann Act.
The information outlet experiences that Diddy believes it was the identical ploy the federal government used to nail rock ‘n roll legend Chuck Berry and boxer Jack Johnson. The rapper additionally identified that it was not a coincidence that they had been each profitable black males, similar to him.
He wrote: “No different individual, and positively no white individual, has ever been prosecuted beneath the White-Slave Site visitors Act for hiring male escorts from one other State.”
Article continues beneath commercial
Diddy Makes use of Former New York Governor As An Instance In His Argument
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15415/15415695c09a88d2b60de9c80e57f8c14b3db8e6" alt="Diddy arrives at the 2018 Vanity Fair Oscar Party held at the Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts on March 4, 2018 in Beverly Hills, Los Angeles"
Diddy’s attorneys have maintained that he is harmless of the costs, and their newest transfer suggests he is accusing the federal government of solely charging him as a result of he is black.
The U.S. Lawyer’s workplace slapped the third depend on him for allegedly hiring male intercourse employees to attend his intercourse events, often known as “freak offs.”
Nevertheless, the “Finna Get Free” rapper believes “he’s being prosecuted for conduct that frequently goes unpunished.”
He introduced up former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, who was just about concerned in the identical escort scandal however was solely compelled to resign in 2008.
Diddy famous that 4 individuals working the escort service in Spitzer’s case had been charged beneath the Mann Act, however Spitzer himself was not.
Article continues beneath commercial
The embattled rapper’s attorneys say prosecutors have constructed their case “primarily based totally on allegations that Mr. Combs and two of his longtime girlfriends typically introduced a 3rd celebration — a male escort — into their sexual relationship.”
They went on to say that hiring escorts is “frequent and certainly extensively accepted in American tradition at this time,” including that the enterprise is a legit one working “out within the open.”
Article continues beneath commercial
The Rapper’s Legal professionals Preserve His Innocence
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e669/2e6696ea2d1912246429207033c9504299b0c668" alt="Mayor Eric Adams Awards Key to the City of New York to Sean Diddy Combs at VIP Space out in Times Square in New York."
The “Dangerous Boy For Life” rapper stays incarcerated on the infamous Metropolitan Detention Middle in New York forward of his trial on Could 5.
He has tried to get bail however was denied a number of instances on account of him being a “flight threat,” amongst different causes given by a choose.
Lately, a sexual assault lawsuit filed by an nameless girl was dismissed with prejudice. The individual alleged that Diddy and Jay-Z raped her when she was solely 13 years outdated at a 2000 MTV VMAs celebration.
Responding to the dismissal, his authorized crew issued an announcement sustaining his innocence.
Article continues beneath commercial
“For months, we have now seen case after case filed by people hiding behind anonymity, pushed ahead by an lawyer extra targeted on media headlines than authorized benefit. Identical to this declare, the others will crumble as a result of there isn’t a reality to them,” the assertion stated.
It continued: “That is simply the primary of many that won’t maintain up in a court docket of regulation.”
Diddy Sues NBC Common, Ample, And Peacock
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbd71/cbd71e4450a44f25441a2d39dbea387a74571c46" alt="Diddy seen as guest at Jimmy Kimmel Show"
Diddy just lately filed a $100 million defamation lawsuit towards NBCUniversal, Peacock TV, and Ample Leisure for defamatory statements printed within the documentary “Diddy: The Making of a Dangerous Boy.”
The documentary featured a number of former associates and acquaintances of the rapper, together with Al B. Positive and Rodney Jones.
Nevertheless, Diddy alleged that the media firms “falsely, recklessly, and maliciously” made damning allegations towards him, together with serial homicide and intercourse trafficking, amongst others.
His lawyer, Erica Wolff, issued an announcement following the submitting, claiming that these media firms “made a acutely aware choice to line their very own pockets on the expense of reality, decency, and fundamental requirements {of professional} journalism,” per Variety.
Article continues beneath commercial
Diddy’s Legal professionals Declare Media Firms Are ‘Exploiting The Belief Of Their Viewers’
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8046/e80468f73ee63648bcf69c9d3fc1ff8b4f96cc8d" alt="Diddy at the BET Awards 2022"
In Wolff’s assertion, she additional famous that the assorted exposés on Diddy had been full of “lies.”
She stated, “Grossly exploiting the belief of their viewers and racing to outdo their competitors for essentially the most salacious Diddy exposé, Defendants maliciously and recklessly broadcast outrageous lies in ‘Diddy: The Making of a Dangerous Boy.'”
Wolff stated that the defendants accused Diddy of “horrible crimes ” even when they knew there was “no proof” to assist their claims, including that they solely sought to “capitalize on the general public’s urge for food for scandal with none regard for the reality and on the expense of Mr. Combs’s proper to a good trial.”
“Mr. Combs brings this lawsuit to carry Defendants accountable for the extraordinary harm their reckless statements have brought about,” the assertion famous.