Curious concerning the newest copyright authorized battle involving Taylor Swift? Florida artist Kimberly Marasco has filed a second copyright infringement lawsuit in opposition to the pop star, increasing her claims to incorporate high trade figures like Jack Antonoff, Aaron Dessner, Common Music Group, and Republic Information. This lawsuit follows a earlier case that was dismissed resulting from procedural points.
We’ll break down Marasco’s allegations, Swift’s collaborators’ involvement, and what’s subsequent within the lawsuit.
Why did Kimberly Marasco sue Taylor Swift for second time?
Florida artist Kimberly Marasco has filed a second copyright infringement lawsuit in opposition to Taylor Swift. She has expanded her claims to incorporate songwriters Jack Antonoff and Aaron Dessner, together with Common Music Group and Republic Information.
The lawsuit alleges that Swift and her collaborators used Marasco’s authentic materials with out authorization. The songs in query embody “Who’s Afraid of Little Outdated Me?” and “I Can Do It With a Damaged Coronary heart” from The Tortured Poets Division. Marasco additionally reasserts claims in opposition to “The Man” (Lover) and “Midnight Rain” (Midnights), which have been a part of her authentic lawsuit.
Marasco initially sued Swift in April 2024 however didn’t serve the lawsuit in time, main Decide Aileen Cannon to dismiss it with out prejudice in December. The claims in opposition to Swift’s manufacturing firm, Taylor Swift Productions, Inc., stay unresolved. In her newly filed criticism, Marasco has elevated her demand for damages from $7 million to $25 million and filed the lawsuit individually from her earlier case. Decide Jose E. Martinez will now preside over the matter (by way of Newsweek).
The lawsuit names Antonoff and Dessner as key defendants, alleging they contributed to the infringing songs. Antonoff co-wrote Illicit Affairs (Folklore) and Down Dangerous (The Tortured Poets Division). Dessner labored on Hoax (Folklore) and Demise by a Thousand Cuts (Lover). The criticism states, “Plaintiff will as soon as once more try service upon Taylor Swift however won’t embody Taylor Swift Productions on this lawsuit.”
Marasco has struggled with procedural points. Final month, Decide Cannon struck her response for violating courtroom guidelines. Swift’s authorized crew continues to hunt dismissal of the claims in opposition to her manufacturing firm. Defendants have 21 days to reply as soon as served.
